Paws for hope foundation and paws for hope better together program WARNING health being affected just got off the phone with my doctor

 Final Statement & Direct Pre-Warning

​I have just concluded a call with my physician. The severe, sustained stress and anxiety caused directly by the actions of the Paws for Hope Foundation and the Paws for Hope Better Together Program have resulted in a critical deterioration of my health, triggering severe Fibromyalgia flare-ups that now require extensive medical testing. While specific diagnostic details will remain strictly confidential between myself and my doctor to prevent misrepresentation, these physical consequences are officially documented in my medical records.

​This health crisis is the direct result of the program's improper conduct first attempting an invalid termination over personal blog posts outside the program's scope, and then, just ten days after that attempt was successfully disproved, issuing a second arbitrary termination without appeal or adherence to binding standards. Despite claiming on public platforms to support disabled community members and their animals, the foundation has actively stripped away essential support from my senior dog, Zoe who remains medically necessary and disregarded my puppy, who was acquired specifically to be certified as a service dog for mobility assistance.

​Utilizing my dog’s image for five years to solicit donor funds while withholding required medical support behind closed doors contradicts the foundation's stated mission. Continued blog updates and upcoming Google reviews will proceed to ensure complete public and donor transparency. Consider this a formal pre-warning: if this continuous, undue stress results in my hospitalization or further severe health complications, full responsibility lies squarely on the Paws for Hope Foundation and the Paws for Hope Better Together Program. I urge the organization to acknowledge these actions, issue an apology, rectify these breaches, and realign its focus on what truly matters: animal welfare and ethical support for disabled participants.

Final Statement & Legal Notice

​Notice is hereby given that the repeated administrative actions taken by the Paws for Hope Foundation and the Paws for Hope Better Together Program violate fundamental legal standards, specifically the principle of res judicata. You issued an initial termination letter on July 6, 2026. After I formally disputed this invalid action, you returned just ten days later on July 16, 2026, with a secondary notice declaring the termination finalized and blocking any further internal appeal. Legally, you cannot repeatedly penalize and terminate a participant over the same disputed grounds. We are bound by a legal contract the Better Together Enrollment Agreement and Consent Form, signed on August 16, 2021. By arbitrarily withholding essential veterinary resources from my senior dog, Zoe, and my service-dog-in-training, you are in direct breach of this agreement and your stated mandate to support disabled community members.

​Furthermore, the undue strain caused by your continuous breaches of contract has directly resulted in a documented deterioration of my physical health, specifically inducing severe Fibromyalgia flare-ups that now require extensive medical testing. I remain open to a civil resolution: immediately reinstate full program enrollment and medical care coverage for both of my dogs, at which point all related blog commentary will be permanently removed. Should the foundation refuse to honor our binding contract, I will not hesitate to pursue formal legal recourse through the courts. I will sue for damages, breach of contract, and the direct physical harm your negligence has caused. You have a choice on how to proceed; make the right one.

Paws for hope foundation and paws for hope better together program

 Public Notice & Statement of Accountability

​Regarding the Paws for Hope Foundation and the Paws for Hope Better Together Program

​This statement serves as a formal public disclosure regarding the administrative practices, ethical concerns, and operational inconsistencies observed within the Paws for Hope Foundation and its Paws for Hope Better Together Program.

​1. Due Process Violations and Retaliatory Actions

​Participation in community support initiatives should never require individuals to surrender their right to free expression. Recent actions by the Paws for Hope Foundation raise serious concerns regarding administrative transparency and participant rights:

​Attempted Retaliatory Termination: An initial attempt was made to terminate program enrollment based on external personal communications (a personal blog post). Exercising personal free speech outside the scope of program guidelines does not constitute a valid breach of agreement.

​Denial of Recourse and Due Process: Following the successful dispute of the initial improper attempt, a second termination notice was issued within ten days. Administration has subsequently refused to provide an appeal mechanism, ignoring direct communications and avoiding standard resolution channels.

​2. Misrepresentation of Donor Intent and Harm to Animal Welfare

​The primary mandate of the Paws for Hope Better Together Program as represented to the public and donors is to prevent animal suffering by providing necessary veterinary and medical care to vulnerable pets in the community.

​Withholding Essential Medical Care: Arbitrarily revoking medical support including access to essential veterinary services and specialized prescription diets (such as medical urinary SO food) directly contradicts the organization's stated mission.

​Breach of Donor Trust: Donors contribute funds under the explicit expectation that these resources will directly support animal health and welfare. Using the withdrawal of donor-funded medical care as a punitive measure against clients misrepresents the true application of donor contributions.

​3. Operational Contradictions and Accessibility Barriers

​Significant discrepancies exist between the public statements of the Paws for Hope Foundation regarding community accessibility and their actual service delivery:

​Inconsistent Resource Allocation: While public statements highlight expansion, mobile hubs, and dedicated transportation resources, basic accommodations such as facilitating the delivery of vital medical supplies to homebound or disabled individuals have been denied.

​Unreasonable Burden on Clients: Categorizing a request for essential medical food delivery as "excessive pressure" demonstrates a fundamental failure to accommodate individuals with documented disabilities.

​4. Severe Physical Health Consequences for Disabled Participants

​The administrative decisions and ongoing lack of communication from the Paws for Hope Foundation carry severe, real-world consequences for program participants:

​Exacerbation of Chronic Disability: For individuals living with chronic neurological and physical conditions, such as Fibromyalgia, severe and prolonged stress triggers critical nervous system overdrive.

​Documented Health Deterioration: The sudden loss of vital care for dependent animals induces profound physical strain, leading to systemic health complications that require immediate physician intervention and diagnostic testing.

​Duty of Care: Organizations serving disabled community members must maintain a standard of care. Operating with negligence toward a participant's physical well-being creates substantial liability and ethical failure.

​Conclusion & Public Record

​Transparency is essential when public trust and donor funds are involved. This record is published to document facts, maintain accountability, and advocate for ethical standards within the Paws for Hope Foundation and the Paws for Hope Better Together Program.

​All statements, administrative communications, and operational contradictions referenced herein are documented and maintained for public and legal record. Community organizations must be held to the highest standard of accountability for the welfare of the animals they serve and the rights of the disabled individuals who rely on them.

Paws for hope foundation and paws for hope better together program DENYING REJECTING A DISABLED PERSON WITH A 13-YEAR-OLD SENIOR DOG AND PUPPY IN TRAINING TO BE A CERTIFIED SERVICE DOG FOR MY FIBROMYALGIA COMPLEX PTSD AND SEVERE OCD

 

paws for hope foundation and paws for hope better together program

 Public Mission vs. Private Reality: Actions Speak Louder Than Words at Paws for Hope

​If you visit the Paws for Hope Animal Foundation website, you will find a public mission stating that they work to "ensure that no pet gets left behind" and "keep pets and people together." But as the saying goes: actions speak louder than words. When someone says they are going to do something, they need to actually do it.

​The reality of how they treat program participants tells a completely different story. My 13-year-old senior dog, Zoe, and I are no longer in the Better Together program. Our services have been officially terminated, and at the end of the day, this is about my 13-year-old senior dog and my puppy being neglected and left without the care they are entitled to.

​A One-Sided Street: Lies, Manipulation, and Gaslighting

In the past, Dr. Llewellyn asked me to remove people’s names from my posts and do certain things to cooperate. I fulfilled my obligations and did exactly what was asked. But it cannot be a one-way street where they take, take, take, and give nothing in return but neglect, lies, manipulation, and gaslighting.

​Because they refuse to work with me or fulfill their end of the contract, I am no longer leaving names out. People need to know the truth about who is involved and exactly what has happened.

​Medical Necessity and the HandyDART Reality

When I enrolled in the Better Together program, we signed a binding agreement. I am a permanently disabled individual managing severe fibromyalgia, complex PTSD, and severe OCD. I am also a permanent HandyDART customer, which the foundation is fully aware of.

​My 13-year-old senior dog is medically necessary. To resolve transit issues and comply with HandyDART standards, I acquired a Papillon puppy to train and get certified as a service dog so she can ride the bus with me. I worked this out directly with HandyDART. Instead of supporting a disabled client navigating these necessary accessibility steps, Paws for Hope refused enrollment for the puppy under rigid criteria and then used out-of-bounds reasons to terminate Zoe’s care entirely.

​Unauthorized Use of Photos and "Washing Their Hands"

To make matters worse, the foundation utilized photos of my senior dog for donation campaigns spanning from 2021 to 2026. I explicitly instructed Executive Director Kathy Powelson not to use my dog's photo anymore and to take any and all photos of her down because I knew they were actively looking for fabricated reasons to terminate us.

​They are incredibly fast to try and wash their hands of me and by extension, wash their hands of my senior dog. I recently received an email from the manager at Scottsdale Veterinarian Clinic asking where they should transfer Zoe's files. I never asked for my files to be transferred. They are just trying to get rid of us as quickly as possible, leaving a 13-year-old dog without her entitled medical care.

​To compound this, I recently found out that the previous vet I was going to return to passed away last month. I am left dealing with that loss on top of an organization that clearly has no heart and couldn't care less about what happens to an animal.

​Ignoring Evidence and Breaking the Law

I presented the proper dates, emails, and screenshots to correct the record regarding their fabricated claims. Despite this evidence, the Board of Directors via Vice President Katelynn Denny formally closed the dispute and upheld the termination.

​By ignoring the binding nature of our contract and established legal principles like res judicata, they are breaking the law. I have retained a pro bono lawyer to pursue formal legal action.

​Donors deserve to know the truth. The public narrative presented on their website is a facade. Behind closed doors, they will drop a disabled client and deny a senior dog medical care over internal politics, proving that their words mean absolutely nothing.

Hope for paws foundation hope for paws better together program hope you're happy Dr peters RIP💔

It Should Always Be About the Animal

​I just got notified that Dr. Peters passed away in June 2026. I just got off the phone with his wife, and I am completely devastated. That man was amazing. He went above and beyond for my dog, and it actually brings tears to my eyes that such an amazing vet is no longer here.

​I remember how my 13-year-old senior dog would get so excited every time I’d say, "We're going to see Dr. Peters!" Her tail would start wagging immediately. The moment she heard his voice in the office, her tail would go, and she would be so incredibly excited to see him. I have never seen her like that with any other vet. He was always so gentle with her, and the relationship we had with him meant he was like family. I don't know who to turn to now, because the one person I thought I could turn to is no longer here.

​It just seems like at every turn, every person is completely giving up on my dog. Her previous vet , Dr. Llewellyn, doesn't care about the situation that's going on. If he did, he wouldn't be giving up on my 13-year-old senior girl. She doesn't deserve this. She doesn't need to be passed around. She deserves to have a vet that she knows, a vet that she's comfortable with, and get the medical care that she deserves. Which was stripped away by hope for paws foundation and hope for paws better together program.

​At the end of the day, people are making this about themselves. They are making it about their situations, about this, and about that when it should always be about the animal. That is what it comes down to, and the one person she had left who truly cared is no longer here.

​

​In Loving Memory of Dr. Peters

​Thank you so much for everything that you have done for both me and my dog. I will always remember the way her demeanor would change the second she knew we were seeing you. Hearing your voice in the waiting room made her whole body wag. You were truly special, and you treated her like family. Now, she has not only lost you, but she has lost the other vet who I thought had her back and cared, too you always went way beyond for my dog even saying don't worry about the cost he would wave fees and say I just want you 2 to be okay I remember you would even help with a rides if I needed one you truly touched alot hearts if you are listening and hear me please help guide me you more then just our vet you were a friend and family all day ive been crying lost worried I need you're guidance right now with everything im going through.💔😢🥺

​To the Hope for Paws Foundation and the Hope for Paws Better Together program:

​I want you to realize the really bad situation you have put me and my 13-year-old senior dog in. It is horrible what you are putting me through and what you continue to put me through. And it isn't just me that is suffering it is my 13-year-old senior dog, and my puppy who is just trying to get certified.

​You say you don't cause harm to people or animals, but this is exactly what you are doing. You do not understand the effect that your actions, choices, and decisions have on people people lives animals lives mental health and physical health you've flared my fibromyalgia up so bad my nerves are shot Finding out the news about Dr. Peters today just puts the icing on the cake, and it has been proven with everything you have put me through that you just don't care actions speak louder then words and shows alot about a person's character.

​Dr. Peters, I wish you were here.💔

Paws for hope foundation paws for hope better together program what happens behind closed doors

Core Argument: Highlighting how participants are penalized for advocating for their animals, facing retaliatory terminations, and experiencing administrative hurdles after fundraising is done using their stories and photos.

Title: Behind Closed Doors: What Hope for Paws Doesn't Want Donors to Know

When you donate to the Hope for Paws Foundation and its Better Together program, you are told a specific story. You are told that your money keeps vulnerable, disabled pet owners and their senior animals together. You are told that the organization provides a safety net so people do not have to choose between their health and their loyal companions.

The public marketing looks compassionate. The website promises support. But what happens when the doors close and the administrative machinery takes over?

The Reality Behind the Marketing

Behind the glossy brochures and donor appeals lies a system where advocacy is treated as a threat. Executive Director Kathy Powelson and the administration operate in a way that penalizes participants who speak up. When a disabled owner fights for their 13-year-old senior dog to receive proper care or attempts to bring in a new puppy for service training they are met with resistance, bureaucratic roadblocks, and retaliatory actions and threats.

For years, participants bite their tongues and stay silent. They endure mental, emotional, and psychological stress because they are terrified that speaking out will mean losing the medical care their aging animals desperately need. Hope for Paws relies on that fear, knowing that loving pet owners will swallow their pride and tolerate mistreatment and abuse just to keep their animals alive.

Broken Promises and Double Terminations

It is time to talk about the hypocrisy of issuing multiple, conflicting termination notices when a participant dares to challenge administrative overreach. When an organization uses a participant's animals photos and stories to drive donations, yet blocks access to the resources those donations fund, that is misleading the community.

Board members Vice President Katelynn Denny stand by while executive leadership creates a hostile, high-school-drama environment. Actions speak louder than words. Claiming to care about a 13-year-old senior dog while turning your back on its owner's rights under a binding contract is indefensible end a puppy that is getting trained to be a certified service dog.

Opening the Doors

Donors deserve to know where their money is actually going. They deserve to know that the foundation uses rigid policies to gatekeep resources, push out disabled community members, and retaliate against advocates.

The doors are opening, and the truth is coming out. If Hope for Paws wants to act like a bully behind closed doors, the public is going to see exactly how they treat the disabled community they claim to serve.

The truth will always prevail, and no matter what the truth will always come to the surface. And that's why, when I say I'm divinely protected, I'm divinely protected. Trust me, believe that cause I got a lot of people watching over me. And a lot of people that are standing behind behind me and a lot of people that have my back and trust me, the community will see the true colors and think about it, too, another thing. I wanna mention, and I mentioned it before. They don't even have a human resource coordinator they're supposed to have one, and they don't even have one, they don't even have enough staff, because staff don't even stick around, you know how many staff members see mean, come and go.Since twenty twenty 12 twenty twenty two, it is insane.The amount of people that i've seen come and go and you know why Executive Director Kathy Powelson the way she speaks to people, the way she treats people. She is very controlling, she's on a power trip. She is biased, and she always says, well, I make the decisions. Sure, yeah, you make some decisions. But at the end of the day when you have board members, it's called a board member's president. The board members president makes the decisions. Not you like it's just unreal. How many times I've heard her say that like, and I had to, you know, add the board of a director's president. Numerous times and emails with her. Because she literally gets on a power trip. She is literally a bully she waited until the board of directors president went away for three weeks. And once he went away for three weeks, that's when all the termination started. That's when all the b******* started. That's when she tried to find a reason to terminate me. First, it was the blog and then it was, oh this state. And that date happened, and this happened. And that happened, give me names, where did it happen?What time you guys can't even provide me with evidence or proof and you can't even put it in your d*** f****** termination papers, either, which is so crazy to me, if something is true.Only the truth makes sense.None what paws for hope foundation paws for hope better together says makes sense your dates.Don't make sense.Nothing you guys do make sense i can't wait till you guys get.Educated inres judicata you don't think it applies, it applies to contracts. Trust me, I know and you guys don't think it does.Trust me, you're about to get educated.

 

Where Do All the Donations Really Go?

​Every single day, thousands of people go online to donate their hard earned money. They believe they are supporting a charitable cause that helps disabled individuals and protects vulnerable animals. They think their contributions are making a genuine difference in the community.

​The public sees the marketing and the heartwarming mission statements, but they do not see what happens behind closed doors. They do not know how resources are actually being withheld from disabled people who are fully entitled to them. They do not know that assistance is being denied to senior animals and puppies who need medical care the most.

​Donors deserve to know the truth about where their money is going. Transparency matters. When an organization accepts public funds under the guise of helping those in need, but turns around and cuts off people with disabilities and their animals, the public has a right to see the reality behind the facade. Everything is documented, and the truth is coming to light.