Prayers needed please pray for these 2 to get the medical care they desperately need the community thats donating to Paws for hope animal foundation and paws for hope better together program please help us get the support we need

 

   ©2026 Laura's Truthfulness. All Rights.Reserved.

🐾🙏🐾🙏🐾🙏🐾🙏🐾🙏🐾🙏🐾🙏🐾

I asked my community to pray 🙏 and send prayers for these 2 my 13 year old papillon that's medically necessary and protected under thd bc humans rights with a doctors note and my papillon puppy in training to get certified as a service dog the ministry is helping with training and the public access test to get certified these 2 need serious medical support Paws for hope animal foundation paws for hope better together program is denying them medical care and support and any donors, or anyone that is donating to paws for hope animal foundation or paws for hope better together program. Katelynn Denny Acting President is the one that is preventing them from getting the medical care. That they need, as you can see from my blog posts. So please just send out prayers for them. Please pray for them and just hope to God that you know, something works out or something. Gets worked out, or you know, they end up getting the medical care that the community has donated to them. And that your donations go to them because they are part of the community and part of the community that, you know, you donors youre donations aren't making it to us and I don't know where the donations are going, but they definitely are not going towards helping them with their medical care.That they desperately need and deserve they are being deprived from community resources, which we are part of the community. 

Paws for hope animal foundation hope for paws better together program contract breached

1. Breach of Financial Responsibility

The Contractual Obligation: The "Overview of Services" section states: "Paws for Hope pays 80% of the veterinary charges for initial examinations and ongoing treatment, including prescription medications".

The Breach: Any communication attempting to transition you to a 20% discount arrangement at a private clinic is a direct attempt to abandon the 80% funding model established in the agreement. This is not a "discount" it is a contractually mandated subsidy that they are attempting to withhold.

2. Failure to Provide Essential Support

 The Contractual Obligation: The agreement mandates that after-hours emergency care "must be done in coordination with the Human Support Coordinator".

The Breach: By operating without an active Human Support Coordinator, the organization is failing to provide a role that is contractually required to facilitate your care. They cannot claim you have failed to comply with protocols when they have removed the very staff member required to execute those protocols.

3. Misrepresentation and Bad Faith

The Contractual Obligation: The agreement requires all parties to maintain an environment where everyone is "treated with respect and dignity".

The Breach: Termination based on fabricated dates (e.g., the February 25th falsehood when your evidence proves only February 24th correspondence existed) is a direct violation of the "respect and dignity" clause. Using falsified disciplinary timelines to strip a vulnerable client of necessary medical support is the definition of bad-faith conduct.

4. Failure of Informed Consent and Documentation

The Contractual Obligation: The program is required to maintain thorough records to "protect the public and Veterinary Service Provider".

The Breach: Your strict adherence to record-keeping driven by your OCD and attention to detail has revealed that they are not keeping the records they are legally and contractually obligated to maintain. Their inability to produce accurate correspondence for the dates they cited proves that their "termination" decision is built on falsified evidence, not program compliance.

Paws for hope animal foundation Comprehensive Rebuttal to the July 16, 2026 Termination Letter: Violations of the Better Together Program Manual

 

Comprehensive Rebuttal to the July 16, 2026 Termination Letter: Violations of the Better Together Program Manual

 Comprehensive Rebuttal to the July 16, 2026 Termination Letter: Violations of the Better Together Program Manual

This document serves as a complete factual dismantling of the July 16, 2026 termination letter. The Board’s position is not only built on fabricated disciplinary dates and undeniable conflicts of interest, but it also represents a systemic violation of the organization's own published policies, financial mandates, and ethical guidelines.

The 80% Coverage Mandate and the "Economic Euthanasia" Contradiction

The organization’s attempt to negotiate a private 20% discount directly with a veterinary clinic is a blatant violation of the Better Together Agreement and the program’s manual.

The Policy:** Under the ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA, the manual dictates: "Paws for Hope pays 80% of the veterinary charges for initial examinations and ongoing treatment, including prescription medications." Furthermore, the PAYMENTS AND PRICING section caps the client copayment at exactly 20%.

 The Violation: The 20% discount offered by Dr. Llewellyn is actually the discount the VSP is required to provide to the program itself for sick care. Passing this clinic discount onto a client on a fixed disability income while withdrawing the 80% fund subsidy is a functional breach of contract.

The Impact: By demanding mathematically impossible out of pocket costs, the Board is actively forcing a scenario of "economic euthanasia." This directly violates the program’s EXPECTED OUTCOMES (Page 5), which explicitly state the program exists to reduce "economic euthanasia and surrendering to shelters and rescues due to a treatable medical condition."

The Complete Absence of the Human Support Coordinator

The Board bypassed mandatory conflict resolution protocols to issue a sudden termination, a procedural failure rooted in the organization's lack of required staff.

The Policy: Page 7 of the manual dictates: "The Better Together program is run by a Human Support Coordinator (HSC)." This role is specifically required under POTENTIAL LIABILITIES to "help resolve conflicts" and mitigate client dissatisfaction.

The Violation: Paws for Hope does not currently employ a Human Support Coordinator.

The Impact: Because this role does not exist, the organization is functionally incapable of operating its own program. You cannot legally penalize a client or push a termination for a financial dispute when the organization has failed to provide the very staff member designated to negotiate those barriers and mediate those conflicts.

Hypocrisy Regarding Mental Health, Disability, and Trauma-Informed Practice.

The administrative tactics used in this termination process weaponize the exact systemic barriers the organization claims to dismantle.

The Policy: On Page 3, the organization claims to acknowledge the barriers created by "disability" and "mental health," committing to equitable support. Furthermore, Page 5 promises a "Trauma Informed Practice" that emphasizes "physical, psychological, and emotional safety" to create empowerment and control.

The Violation: Utilizing fabricated disciplinary dates, bypassing mediation, and threatening immediate financial ruin is the antithesis of psychological safety. For an individual managing severe complex PTSD and severe OCD, routine, strict documentation, and predictability are vital.

The Impact: Attempting to strip a disabled individual of their financial support through administrative deception is inherently punitive and destabilizing. The Board’s actions completely obliterate their "Trauma Informed" claims, exposing them as purely performative.

Chronic Care and Palliative Guarantees.

If the Board attempts to justify the withdrawal of support based on the ongoing needs of a 13-year-old senior dog, their own coverage definitions prevent this.

The Policy: Under SICK CARE COVERAGE , the manual explicitly includes "acute and chronic illness" and "prescriptions." It further guarantees that in cases of projected high costs or grave prognosis, coverage is maintained for "palliative care to maintain quality of life."

The Violation: Zoe’s need for urinary SOS food and treats to provent bladderstones, and chronic care falls strictly under the covered definitions of this manual. There is no policy loophole that allows the organization to abandon coverage for an aging, medically necessary dog developing chronic conditions.

Fabricated Disciplinary Dates and Record-Keeping Failures.

The termination letter attempts to justify removal by citing non existent conduct warnings, violating the organization's strict documentation rules.

The Policy: The manual requires "thorough record keeping to document the communication" to mitigate liabilities and demands strict "Informed Consent" regarding financial estimates.

The Violation: As previously documented, there is absolutely no email or record of an incident on February 24th, 2025. Furthermore, the June 1, 2025 date has been falsely classified; timestamped emails prove this was a discussion regarding health impacts and financial capacity, not a disciplinary issue.

Conclusion:

By falsifying timelines, operating with undeniable conflicts of interest, abandoning the 80% coverage mandate, and failing to staff their required Human Support Coordinator, this termination process is exposed as an illegitimate, bad faith action. I expect my medically necessary dog’s veterinary coverage to remain fully intact under the explicitly defined terms of the Better Together Agreement.

Laura.

Paws for hope animal foundation.

 https://www.pawsforhope.org/what-we-do/remote-communities/

The Reality of "Transportation Funding": Nine Months of Out-of-Pocket Costs

Paws for hope animal foundation website claims they are committed to removing barriers for those who lack vehicles, specifically boasting that they provide "funding for transportation and transfers." But their public marketing is a far cry from the reality I experienced.

​For nine months straight, I was forced to travel back and forth to the Scottsdale Veterinary Clinic to ensure my senior dog received the care she needed. During that entire nine-month period, I never received a single cent of transportation support from Paws for hope animal foundation. Instead, I was forced to pay out-of-pocket for Ubers and cabs every single time, depleting my own limited funds to get to and from appointments.

​The "Pressure" Narrative: A Tool for Denial

​The hypocrisy runs even deeper than their public marketing. When I reached out to Paws for hope animal foundation representative Kathy Palason for helpnoting the immense burden of these trips and requesting assistance with my senior dog's medical food I was met with hostility. Kathy Powelson Executive Director explicitly told me that by asking for help, I was "putting pressure on the program." Kathy Powelson Executive Director dismissed my request entirely, claiming that they "don't deliver food" and that "that's not what they're about."

​Let’s be clear: they advertise a service to the public to secure donations, but when a disabled client actually needs that service, they claim it’s "not what they’re about" and accuse the client of being a burden.

​A Pattern of Deception

​The more I dig into this organization, the more lies I uncover. For nine months of constant trips to Scottsdale Veterinary Clinic, I bore the entire financial and logistical load while they sat on hundreds of thousands of dollars in annual donations.

​As a permanent HandyDart client, I have no other accessible transportation, made it impossible for me to navigate this system without the support the organization refuses to give. They didn't just fail to provide the transportation funding they promise; they actively shamed me for asking for it.

​When you strip away the marketing, the reality is a foundation that forces disabled clients to fund their own care, strings them along for weeks under the guise of finding "volunteers," and then gaslights them when they ask for the support they are entitled to. I have the screenshots, the recorded conversations, and the email evidence.

​Looking back at my time in the program from 2021 to 2026, the pattern of neglect is undeniable. In those five years, I have not once received the transportation support they claim to provide. As I continue to dig, I am discovering more and more resources that they have intentionally cut me out of resources that were meant for the community, but we're being deliberately withheld from me. This is not just a failure of a program; it is a systematic denial of the support I am entitled to, and I will continue to expose these lies until I receive the support I am owed and deserve.

My community donates to people like me, and i'm part of the community that is part of the community that is supposed to be entitled to these resources from Paws for hope animal foundation but instead

They are making excuses and reasons to not provide me with the resources that I need for my medically necessary, 13-year-old senior girl, and also my puppy that is going to have to go through training. And then get the public access test done and get certified as a service. Dog, it is disheartening that my community doesn't even know that I am being strepped away from these resources that are completely donated to people like me. And I hope that people see the truth and the reality of the situation. And

I'm a strong believer that the truth will always prevail. And it always does, and the truth is coming out slowly. But surely I'm finding more and more things that I didn't know or was aware of and I'm finding these things out now, and that's why I'm letting my community know that this is what happened to me. And this is what is happening to me. And again, this isn't about me. This is about 2 dogs. Okay? A puppy that is gonna be getting trained to get certified. As a service dog and a 13-year-old senior dog, it's about the animals. Okay, this is not about the people.There are gonna people, that don't like each other. It's just like when me and Dr. Lowland had a conversation.You know, there's people you know, that, you know, we're not gonna like, and we both agreed on that.And that's okay, but that doesn't mean you strip resources away from someone that is entitled to those resources. As part of the community and the community is to people like me, so I hope that, you know, the people that are nigging and making donations. You know, just please beware and please be cautious. Because look at what I'm going through and look at what they're putting me through. And the lies, the manipulation, the gaslighting, you know, trying to get me to, you know, stay with my vet, and then me pay eighty percent, and they pay twenty percent.But then when I was in the better together program that is connected toPaws for hope animal foundation they were paying 80%, and I was paying 20%. You know, that's in my previous post. And that just that absolutely makes no sense to do that. To somebody that is disabled on disability and on a strictcome. There's no way that I would be able to afford a puppy. And a dog paying 20% with me paying eighty percent, there is no way even a person that has a full time job still wouldn't even be able to afford that.And you think somebody on disability is gonna be able to do that.

Understanding the Invisible: A Note on Health, Trauma, and Advocacy

 

​I am writing this to share a bit more about the realities of my life. When I post on this blog, it is not just to share updates; it is a vital part of my cognitive behavioral toolkit. It is how I externalize my anxiety, process my thoughts, and manage the intense overthinking that comes with my conditions.

​Living with Fibromyalgia, Complex PTSD (C-PTSD), and OCD is a constant, invisible battle. I also manage severe migraines, asthma, and am currently recovering from recent surgery. To help those who read this understand why situations like my recent dispute over veterinary care have such a profound impact on me, I want to break down what these conditions actually look like.

​Fibromyalgia: This is far more than just "pain." It is a chronic condition causing widespread musculoskeletal pain, fatigue, and cognitive difficulties often called "fibro fog." When I am under extreme stress, my nervous system goes into overdrive, causing my entire body to ache, my breathing to become difficult, and my pain levels to skyrocket.

​Complex PTSD (C-PTSD): Unlike standard PTSD, this often results from prolonged, repeated trauma. It deeply affects how I trust others. My brain is constantly scanning for threats because of my history. When I am told someone will help me and that trust is then broken or when I feel neglected by an organization I relied on my C-PTSD tells me that I am unsafe. It makes it incredibly difficult to believe that someone is "on my side," which leads to fear, anxiety, and the tendency to assume the worst.

​OCD (Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder): My OCD causes me to become trapped in loops of overanalyzing and intrusive thoughts. When I am stressed, my brain demands answers and certainty. If I don't feel I have the full picture, I can become impulsive, acting out of that urgent need to protect myself and my dogs.

​Why This Matters

My 13-year-old senior dog is my world. She is medically necessary for my stability. She picks up on my cues, and she keeps me grounded. When I face a situation where her medical care is threatened or dismissed, it is not just a policy issue; it is a direct threat to my safety and my ability to function.

​I am a very impulsive person. I have had to work incredibly hard to break negative patterns in my life, and I am proud of the progress I have made. However, when I am hit with intense trauma or fear, I sometimes react quickly. I recently made a post out of fear and confusion, and I deleted it as soon as I realized I had misunderstood the conversation I was having. That was a moment of reactive fear, and I am learning, day by day, that I need to pause, breathe, and ask questions before my brain spirals.

​I am sharing this because I know there are others out there who struggle with similar conditions. People often do not see the weight that a disabled person carries. Every decision, every interaction, and every stressful change—like the uncertainty I have been navigating—takes a massive toll on our mental health.

​I am doing my best to move forward. I am focused on my dogs, my healing, and my sobriety. My goal is to get the medical support my senior dog and my puppy need, and to continue working toward having a fully trained service dog who can help me navigate these challenges with more confidence.

​Thank you for reading and for understanding that when I speak up, it is because I am fighting for the lives of the two beings who mean everything to me.

The Board of Directors, Paws for hope animal foundation lied in termination papers prof screenshots

Three Fabrications in the July 16, 2026 Termination Letter and Rejection of Bad Faith Offers

​I am writing to formally address the contents of the termination letter dated July 16, 2026. This official document contains three blatant fabrications and contradictions that completely invalidate the Board's position.

​Lie #1: The Conflict of Interest Protocol Violation

In the July 16, 2026 letter, Katelynn Denny explicitly states: "You will note that Dr. Llewellyn is not responding to your correspondence personally... To avoid any real or perceived conflict of interest, the Board has asked me, as Vice President, to act as the point of contact for this matter."

​This statement is entirely false in practice. Yesterday, July 17, 2026, Dr. Llewellyn personally contacted me, leaving a voicemail, which was followed by a direct phone conversation today, July 18, 2026, where he attempted to broker a private 20% discount at his veterinary clinic. Both Katelynn Denny and Dr. Llewellyn are actively violating the exact boundaries established in their own termination paperwork.

​Dr. Llewellyn attempting to claim on the phone that he is calling "not as a board member" but "as a veterinarian," and stating he has stepped down as President to be a Board Director, is a meaningless semantic game. You cannot formally recuse a Board Director in writing due to a conflict of interest, only to have him repeatedly contact me privately to negotiate a financial settlement that directly results in my exit from the Better Together program.

​Lie #2 and Lie #3: Fabricated Disciplinary Dates

Furthermore, the termination letter attempts to justify my removal by citing a fabricated timeline of conduct warnings.

​The February 25, 2024 Date: The incident you are attempting to weaponize me with dates with no context. 

There is no email corresponding on February 25th/2025 I keep all my emails and there's no February 25th/2025 only February 24th/2025 I don't know where you're getting these dates explain to me what I did and to who and where and what time and date because I'm seeing nothing but February 24th/2025 and going back a year to something that happened over a year and half ago really shows how desperate you are to find something on me you have nothing on me so stop lying or prove me otherwise this all I can find I have severe OCD I document everything and organize all my emails and paper work so Katelynn Denny Acting President you're sadly mistaken you're just creating dates and thinking they'll stick my OCD and my OCD is severe there's nothing on February 25th/2025.

​The June 1, 2025 Date: You have falsely classified this date as a disciplinary warning. As Katelynn Denny was present and is fully aware, this was a vital discussion regarding the severe physical and financial impact that mandatory weekly vet visits were having on my health. It was not a conduct issue it was a discussion.

Screen shots are below 

​By falsifying the context of these dates and violating your own stated rules regarding Dr. Llewellyn's contact, this entire termination process is exposed as an administrative sham.

​The Financial Reality of the 20% Offer

I am formally rejecting the 20% discount offer because it is mathematically impossible for an individual relying on Persons with Disabilities (PWD) income.

​My monthly budget is strictly fixed. Due to the extra, unavoidable costs required to survive with severe fibromyalgia, I am left with a maximum of $100 to $150 after rent and basic necessities. A 20% discount at Scottsdale Veterinary Hospital, a clinic publicly documented as heavily overpriced, leaves out of pocket costs that would consume my entire remaining budget for a single visit for one dog. Factoring in a 13 year old senior dog and a puppy, this discount would literally leave me unable to buy groceries.

​Attempting to pass the buck to a private clinic's discount program does not absolve the Board of its obligations. My dogs are medically necessary, and I am fully entitled to the support this program publicly claims to provide.

​I expect my 13 year old senior dog's medical care to be reinstated and my puppy to be enrolled immediately. If I do not receive a satisfactory response correcting these three documented lies by Monday morning, I will proceed with formal legal action.

​Finally, I have re examined my Better Together Enrollment Agreement and Consent Form, signed in 2021. That contract explicitly mandates that Paws for Hope pays 80% of veterinary charges, with a required copayment from me of only 20%. It is frankly insulting that you would attempt to bypass this contractual 80% coverage mandate by pressuring me to accept a 20% discount at a private clinic instead. Do you genuinely believe that any reasonable person would voluntarily trade a guaranteed 80% coverage model for a 20% discount that leaves them in financial ruin? This attempt to unilaterally rewrite the terms of my support is a clear indicator that the organization is acting in bad faith.