Paws for hope animal foundation :
Paws for hope better together program.
Please be advised that under Canadian contract law and the legal principles of res judicata and administrative finality, the Foundation is legally barred from issuing a second termination notice.
The initial termination attempt was formally contested and defeated on the grounds that it fell completely outside the scope of the Better Together program and the governing contract. Under Canadian law, once a dispute or disciplinary notice is issued, challenged, and successfully defended against, an organization cannot turn around a week later and issue a second termination notice based on a different or newly manufactured rationale. You do not get to issue successive terminations or take multiple bites at the apple just because your first attempt failed. This constitutes a breach of good faith and an unlawful abuse of process.
Furthermore, my personal blog operates entirely outside the scope of the Better Together program. I possess the full legal right to discuss my personal experiences publicly, and doing so does not violate any terms of our agreement. What I do outside the scope of this program is not the Foundation's business. The Board must stop bringing up my blog and stop issuing invalid termination notices based on my personal activities.
Additionally, it must be officially recorded that both Zoe and my puppy are certified service dogs, not pets, which governs their required status and care under the program.
This situation has gone on long enough, and it will not continue. To resolve this matter immediately in accordance with the law, I expect Zoe to be reinstated into the program and for the puppy's enrollment to be formally processed.
You have until tomorrow morning to respond in writing confirming that these steps have been taken and that the Foundation's unlawful secondary termination notice has been entirely rescinded.
Sincerely,
Laura.
No comments:
Post a Comment